From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard) Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 20:59:42 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 2/3] mfd: axp20x: Add dtsi for axp20x In-Reply-To: <1391875428-6281-3-git-send-email-carlo@caione.org> References: <1391875428-6281-1-git-send-email-carlo@caione.org> <1391875428-6281-3-git-send-email-carlo@caione.org> Message-ID: <20140210195942.GA3192@lukather> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Carlo, On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 05:03:47PM +0100, Carlo Caione wrote: > This patch adds a new dtsi for supporting axp20x. > > Signed-off-by: Carlo Caione > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/axp20x.dtsi | 9 +++++++++ > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/axp20x.dtsi > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/axp20x.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/axp20x.dtsi > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..98d4c7c > --- /dev/null > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/axp20x.dtsi > @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ > +/* > +* Integrated Power Management Chip AXP209 > +*/ > + > +&axp { > + compatible = "x-powers,axp20x"; > + interrupt-controller; > + #interrupt-cells = <1>; > +}; Hmmm, this refers to an undefined node, I can't see this DTSI used anywhere, and why do you need a DTSI of its own in the first place? Thanks, Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: