linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: acme@ghostprotocols.net (Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] perf: ARM64: wire up perf_regs and unwind support
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 10:02:02 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140212130202.GA7116@ghostprotocols.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140212113018.GA29132@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>

Em Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:30:18AM +0000, Will Deacon escreveu:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:27:44AM +0000, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> > > This needs to go via the perf tree to avoid a repeat of the mess last time.

> > If the tooling bits are fine with Arnaldo then I have no objections 
> > either - once all the bits are acked please send a single series with 
> > all 4(?) patches in it, for tip:perf/core inclusion.
 
> I think it's just 1 patch -- the other 3 are under arch/arm64, so it would
> be easier to take those via the arm64 tree and deal with any conflicts
> there.

I don't have a problem with arch specific bits, that don't touch the
tools at all, going thru the respective arch git tree.

Jiri, can you see anything problematic in this? From a quick look I
couldn't.

- Arnaldo

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-12 13:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-03 18:17 [PATCH] perf: ARM64: wire up perf_regs and unwind support Jean Pihet
2014-02-12  8:46 ` Jean Pihet
2014-02-12 10:10   ` Will Deacon
2014-02-12 11:27     ` Ingo Molnar
2014-02-12 11:30       ` Will Deacon
2014-02-12 13:02         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2014-02-12 13:09 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-02-13 17:01   ` Jean Pihet
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-02-13 17:06 Jean Pihet
2014-03-12 12:42 ` Jean Pihet
2014-03-12 17:45   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-03-13 10:12     ` Will Deacon
2014-03-13 10:22       ` Catalin Marinas
2014-03-13 12:01         ` Jean Pihet
2014-04-28  9:15           ` Jean Pihet
2014-04-28  9:24             ` Jiri Olsa
2014-04-28 12:32 ` Jean Pihet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140212130202.GA7116@ghostprotocols.net \
    --to=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).