From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard) Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 15:56:13 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ehci-platform: Change compatible string from usb-ehci to ehci-platform In-Reply-To: <52FA4118.2030100@redhat.com> References: <1392127826-31290-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> <1392127826-31290-3-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> <52FA3B2B.7050906@ti.com> <52FA4118.2030100@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20140212145613.GA9812@lukather> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 04:26:16PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > > I'm even OK with removing "usb-ehci" and "usb-ohci" compatibles > > from all OMAP dts files since they aren't really compatible with > > the original PPC driver. > > I don't think that is necessary, as your grep has shown there are a > lot of dts files using compatible = "foo", "usb-?hci"; and some may > even have the dts in firmware, so we should simply make sure not to > break such dts. For these devices, we can't do much, but at least for the DT that are in Linux, relying on the fact that there is no driver having a compatible of "usb-ehci" to work looks very fragile. I'd be in favour of removing it from the OMAP DTs, and every affected DTs. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: