From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com (Alexandre Belloni) Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:54:09 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v4 3/8] at91: dt: Add at91sam9261 dt SoC support In-Reply-To: <52FC7E0E.2010503@atmel.com> References: <1392199607-27452-1-git-send-email-jjhiblot@traphandler.com> <1392199607-27452-4-git-send-email-jjhiblot@traphandler.com> <20140212172844.GE11498@piout.net> <52FC7E0E.2010503@atmel.com> Message-ID: <20140213085409.GH11498@piout.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 13/02/2014 at 09:10:54 +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote : > On 12/02/2014 20:47, Jean-Jacques Hiblot : > >> > >> You probably copied/pasted it but according to the block diagram, the > >> sdram controller is not under the apb. > > You're right I copied/pasted :o) But the addresses of the registers > > look like typical APB addresses. > > AFAIK all the registers of this SOC are accessed through the APB > > (except for OHCI and LCDC) > > Yes, that is the point: if the register bank appears as an APB address, > I place it on the APB bus. > The other master interfaces (on AHB) are the ones that the IP uses, not > us from the CPU point of view... > > So I think that Jean-Jacques DT is okay concerning this. > Ok, I'm perfectly fine with that. Thanks for the answer ! -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com