From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wsa@the-dreams.de (Wolfram Sang) Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 08:44:07 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: sunxi: dt: Convert to the new i2c compatibles In-Reply-To: <20140213225248.GB15350@lukather> References: <1391680285-16668-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <1391680285-16668-3-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <20140213082630.GA3119@katana> <20140213225248.GB15350@lukather> Message-ID: <20140214074407.GA2569@katana> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > > For non-a10, That should be at least > > > > compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a13-i2c", "allwinner,sun4i-a10-i2c"; > > > > or > > > > compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a13-i2c", "allwinner,sun4i-i2c"; > > > > depending on the outcome above. > > > > Or is my knowledge outdated already? > > > > Since they are strictly compatible, we don't need to introduce any > different compatible string here. You never know all errata in advance. From what I know, one should always use the specfic naming first, and then the generic fallback. So, in case a distinction is needed later (think errata), then one doesn't need to change the devicetrees. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: