From: wsa@the-dreams.de (Wolfram Sang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] i2c: mv64xxx: refactor message start to ensure proper initialization
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 15:44:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140215144453.GB2579@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52FE0056.2030706@free-electrons.com>
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 12:39:02PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> On 13/02/2014 21:36, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > Because the offload mechanism can fall back to a standard transfer,
> > having two seperate initialization states is unfortunate. Let's just
> > have one state which does things consistently. This fixes a bug where
> > some preparation was missing when the fallback happened. And it makes
> > the code much easier to follow.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
>
>
> Tested-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
>
> With this one the bug we observed was fixed.
I squashed patches 1+2 (easier handling for stable) and applied to
for-current, thanks!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140215/5266b037/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-15 14:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-07 10:55 [PATCH] i2c: mv64xxx: Fix locked bus when offload is selected but not used on a message Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-07 15:09 ` Jason Cooper
2014-02-07 15:18 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-07 18:09 ` Kevin Hilman
2014-02-07 18:13 ` Jason Cooper
2014-02-08 17:01 ` Jason Cooper
2014-02-13 9:41 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-02-13 14:23 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-13 20:36 ` [PATCH 0/5] mv64xxx updates Wolfram Sang
2014-02-13 20:36 ` [PATCH 1/5] i2c: mv64xxx: put offload check into offload prepare function Wolfram Sang
2014-02-14 11:38 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-13 20:36 ` [PATCH 2/5] i2c: mv64xxx: refactor message start to ensure proper initialization Wolfram Sang
2014-02-14 11:39 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-15 14:44 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2014-02-13 20:36 ` [PATCH 3/5] i2c: mv64xxx: refactor send_start Wolfram Sang
2014-02-14 11:42 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-13 20:36 ` [PATCH 4/5] i2c: mv64xxx: directly call send_start when initializing transfer Wolfram Sang
2014-02-13 20:36 ` [PATCH 5/5] i2c: mv64xxx: refactor initialization for new msgs Wolfram Sang
2014-02-13 20:41 ` [PATCH 0/5] mv64xxx updates Gregory CLEMENT
2014-03-10 16:25 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-02-13 20:51 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-02-18 11:29 ` Maxime Ripard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140215144453.GB2579@katana \
--to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox