From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jason@lakedaemon.net (Jason Cooper) Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 20:39:49 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] bus: mvebu-mbus: Fix incorrect size for PCI aperture resources In-Reply-To: <20140214182910.GC31093@google.com> References: <1392245828-23244-1-git-send-email-jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> <20140214182910.GC31093@google.com> Message-ID: <20140217013949.GE7862@titan.lakedaemon.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 11:29:10AM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 03:57:07PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > reg[0] is the DT base, reg[1] is the DT length in bytes, > > struct resource.end is the inclusive end address, so a -1 is > > required. > > > > Tested on kirkwood. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe > > Do these two patches need to go together? I don't maintain > drivers/bus/mvebu-mbus.c, but if these should be kept together, I'd be > happy to merge them both, given the appropriate ack from Jason C or Thomas. I have one small change for mvebu-mbus queued up, which won't conflict here. Please take both: Acked-by: Jason Cooper thx, Jason.