From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jason@lakedaemon.net (Jason Cooper) Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 21:49:51 -0500 Subject: [PATCH v3 01/13] ARM: mvebu: rename armada-370-xp.c to armada-mvebu.c In-Reply-To: <20140213142924.4520ccc9@skate> References: <1392289475-8902-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <1392289475-8902-2-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <2036226.egxWL7qC66@wuerfel> <20140213125526.3af08c54@skate> <20140213130745.GU27395@titan.lakedaemon.net> <20140213141355.00e8f2fd@skate> <52FCC771.5090009@gmail.com> <20140213142924.4520ccc9@skate> Message-ID: <20140217024951.GI7862@titan.lakedaemon.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 02:29:24PM +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Dear Sebastian Hesselbarth, > > On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:24:01 +0100, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > > > > Why not. But since this kind of change can be done without breaking the > > > DT compatibility, I'd first prefer to see Dove support merged into > > > mach-mvebu/ with its board file named mach-mvebu/dove.c. Then > > > progressively see what can be combined with armada-mvebu.c so that we > > > can merge both of them into board-v7.c. > > > > Actually, just prepared those patches today. Haven't boot tested but > > compiles cleanly. The patch set will be really small compared to KW > > patch set (but de-hardcoded pinctrl-dove will be a prerequisite). > > Cool! I'm planning on giving a test to your pinctrl patches this > afternoon, if all goes well. > > > I also prefer to move to mach-mvebu/dove.c and then merge with > > armada-3{78}{05x} a cycle later. > > Yes, I agree. I'm fully convinced by the idea of merging the v7 support > together, but we need to proceed step by step to avoid having horrible > merge issues during the 3.15 cycle. Yeah, I don't see how anything can go wrong at all. :) btw - I'll hold off on pulling this for a new revision. Looks like the only change left in the file name. thx, Jason.