[RFC PATCH v2 03/14] of: mtd: add documentation for nand-ecc-level property

[ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com (Ezequiel Garcia)]

On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 04:43:51PM +0000, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Ezequiel Garcia
> <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> > Hi Grant, Boris:
> >
> > (BTW, dropped Russell, Rob Landley and some unrelated mailing lists from Cc,
> > and added Thomas, Gregory and Rob Herring).
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 02:34:44PM +0100, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
> >> On 05/02/2014 12:15, Grant Likely wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:53:32 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> > [..]
> >> >>
> >> >> Maybe we can discuss about it now?
> >> >>
> >> >>    nand-ecc-strength : integer ECC required strength.
> >> >>    nand-ecc-size : integer step size associated to the ECC strength.
> >> > I'm okay with either, but the above binding is indeed more readable.
> >>
> >> That's fine by me, if everybody agrees, let's go for the
> >> nand-ecc-strength/nand-ecc-size couple then.
> >>
> >
> > Great. So, if some DT dictator^C^Cmaintainers can Ack this binding,
> > I can send a new patchset, with pxa3xx-nand using it...
> >
> >> I'll rebase next version of my series on Ezequiel's patch providing
> >> these OF helpers.
> >>
> >
> > ... and then you can base on it?
> >
> > This is the original patchset:
> >
> > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.devicetree/58764
> > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.devicetree/58763
> 
> I've looked at both. Go ahead and add my a-b line:
> 
> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>

Cool. Thanks!

I'll push a patchset now.
-- 
Ezequiel Garc?a, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com