From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bhelgaas@google.com (Bjorn Helgaas) Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 13:38:01 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] bus: mvebu-mbus: Fix incorrect size for PCI aperture resources In-Reply-To: <20140217013949.GE7862@titan.lakedaemon.net> References: <1392245828-23244-1-git-send-email-jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> <20140214182910.GC31093@google.com> <20140217013949.GE7862@titan.lakedaemon.net> Message-ID: <20140218203801.GA8786@google.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 08:39:49PM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote: > On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 11:29:10AM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 03:57:07PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > reg[0] is the DT base, reg[1] is the DT length in bytes, > > > struct resource.end is the inclusive end address, so a -1 is > > > required. > > > > > > Tested on kirkwood. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe > > > > Do these two patches need to go together? I don't maintain > > drivers/bus/mvebu-mbus.c, but if these should be kept together, I'd be > > happy to merge them both, given the appropriate ack from Jason C or Thomas. > > I have one small change for mvebu-mbus queued up, which won't conflict > here. Please take both: > > Acked-by: Jason Cooper I added the acks and applied both patches to pci/host-mvebu for v3.15, thanks! Bjorn