[PATCH 2/2] USB: at91: using USBA_NR_DMAS for DMA channels

[balbi@ti.com (Felipe Balbi)]

On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 09:14:58AM +0800, Bo Shen wrote:
> Hi Felipe Balbi,
> 
> On 02/19/2014 12:19 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> >On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:59:25AM +0800, Bo Shen wrote:
> >>When the SoC is earlier than sama5d3 SoC, which have the same number
> >>endpoints and DMAs. However for sama5d3 SoC, it has different number
> >>for endpoints and DMAs. So, define USBA_NR_DMAs for DMA channels
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>
> >>---
> >>
> >>  drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.c | 2 +-
> >>  drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.h | 2 +-
> >>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.c
> >>index 7e67a81..5cded1c 100644
> >>--- a/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.c
> >>+++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.c
> >>@@ -1661,7 +1661,7 @@ static irqreturn_t usba_udc_irq(int irq, void *devid)
> >>  	if (dma_status) {
> >>  		int i;
> >>
> >>-		for (i = 1; i < USBA_NR_ENDPOINTS; i++)
> >>+		for (i = 1; i < USBA_NR_DMAS; i++)
> >>  			if (dma_status & (1 << i))
> >>  				usba_dma_irq(udc, &udc->usba_ep[i]);
> >>  	}
> >>diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.h b/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.h
> >>index 2922db5..a70706e 100644
> >>--- a/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.h
> >>+++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.h
> >>@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@
> >>  #define USBA_FIFO_BASE(x)	((x) << 16)
> >>
> >>  /* Synth parameters */
> >>-#define USBA_NR_ENDPOINTS	7
> >>+#define USBA_NR_DMAS		7
> >
> >what's the difference ? You just renamed this macro. Also, please
> >clarify a bit your commit log.
> 
> As commit message said, the SoC before sama5d3, the endpoint number
> is the same as DMA channel number, so use endpoints definition for
> DMA channel number, however after sama5d3, the endpoints is not the
> same as DMA channel, so use DMA micro for DMA channels.

which means you're just renaming the macro for the sake of clarity.
That's fine, just needs to be clearer in commit message.

-- 
balbi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140218/995235a1/attachment-0001.sig>