From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas) Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:58:05 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: Add Kconfig option for Samsung GH7 SoC family In-Reply-To: References: <1392100183-30930-1-git-send-email-kgene.kim@samsung.com> <5302B306.8090503@samsung.com> <6032891.ndY8FikAMY@wuerfel> <20140220112248.GC32456@localhost> Message-ID: <20140220185805.GI7651@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 05:09:59PM +0000, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 3:22 AM, Catalin Marinas > > Two additional points: > > > > 1. Single arm64 defconfig file covering everything > > 2. Modules rather than built-in by default where possible (especially > > for server platforms) > > Sounds good to me. Are you also willing to pick up one defconfig per > vendor (but not more)? I think it's been useful to have those on arm, > even on multiplatform kernels. We used them on powerpc as well, where > we had a two-layer approach (ppc64_defconfig and per-platform configs, > pseries/iseries/pasemi/g5/cell). Initially I would keep a single defconfig with everything just to get wider coverage of single Image. Later on, if just deselecting config entries doesn't work, we can revisit per-vendor defconfigs. -- Catalin