* [RFC 0/3] ahci_platform: drop support for a bunch of obsolete platform device types
@ 2014-02-22 16:22 Hans de Goede
2014-02-22 22:04 ` Marek Vasut
2014-02-22 22:13 ` Tejun Heo
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hans de Goede @ 2014-02-22 16:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Hi Tejun, Marek,
This series, which is to be applied on top of my ahci_platform restructering
series, mostly speaks for itself.
I've some doubts about the 2nd patch, which removes the imx53-ahci platform
device support from ahci_platform.c. I'm pretty sure this is obsolete and
replaced by Marek's ahci_imx.c work, but not 100%, which is why this series
is marked as RFC. Marek can you confirm that the code the 2nd patch removes
is inded dead code?
Tejun, if Marek confirms this is indeed dead code feel free to apply this
despite the RFC marking.
Thanks & Regards,
Hans
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [RFC 0/3] ahci_platform: drop support for a bunch of obsolete platform device types
2014-02-22 16:22 [RFC 0/3] ahci_platform: drop support for a bunch of obsolete platform device types Hans de Goede
@ 2014-02-22 22:04 ` Marek Vasut
2014-02-22 22:13 ` Tejun Heo
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Marek Vasut @ 2014-02-22 22:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Saturday, February 22, 2014 at 05:22:52 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi Tejun, Marek,
>
> This series, which is to be applied on top of my ahci_platform
> restructering series, mostly speaks for itself.
>
> I've some doubts about the 2nd patch, which removes the imx53-ahci platform
> device support from ahci_platform.c. I'm pretty sure this is obsolete and
> replaced by Marek's ahci_imx.c work, but not 100%, which is why this series
> is marked as RFC. Marek can you confirm that the code the 2nd patch removes
> is inded dead code?
I can confirm that with your sunxi 15-patch patchset + these three patches , the
SATA port still works on i.MX53 DENX M53EVK board. The behavior from the user's
point of view is unchanged.
> Tejun, if Marek confirms this is indeed dead code feel free to apply this
> despite the RFC marking.
>
> Thanks & Regards,
>
> Hans
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [RFC 0/3] ahci_platform: drop support for a bunch of obsolete platform device types
2014-02-22 16:22 [RFC 0/3] ahci_platform: drop support for a bunch of obsolete platform device types Hans de Goede
2014-02-22 22:04 ` Marek Vasut
@ 2014-02-22 22:13 ` Tejun Heo
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2014-02-22 22:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 05:22:52PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi Tejun, Marek,
>
> This series, which is to be applied on top of my ahci_platform restructering
> series, mostly speaks for itself.
>
> I've some doubts about the 2nd patch, which removes the imx53-ahci platform
> device support from ahci_platform.c. I'm pretty sure this is obsolete and
> replaced by Marek's ahci_imx.c work, but not 100%, which is why this series
> is marked as RFC. Marek can you confirm that the code the 2nd patch removes
> is inded dead code?
>
> Tejun, if Marek confirms this is indeed dead code feel free to apply this
> despite the RFC marking.
Applied 1-3 to libata/for-3.15.
Thanks.
--
tejun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-02-22 22:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-02-22 16:22 [RFC 0/3] ahci_platform: drop support for a bunch of obsolete platform device types Hans de Goede
2014-02-22 22:04 ` Marek Vasut
2014-02-22 22:13 ` Tejun Heo
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).