From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/6] generic early_ioremap support
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 18:30:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140225183012.GA27164@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1393337404.7307.51.camel@deneb.redhat.com>
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 02:10:04PM +0000, Mark Salter wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 15:56 -0500, Mark Salter wrote:
> > This patch series takes the common bits from the x86 early ioremap
> > implementation and creates a generic implementation which may be used
> > by other architectures. The early ioremap interfaces are intended for
> > situations where boot code needs to make temporary virtual mappings
> > before the normal ioremap interfaces are available. Typically, this
> > means before paging_init() has run.
> >
> > These patches are layered on top of generic fixmap patches which
> > were pulled into 3.14-rc with the exception of the arm patch:
> >
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/25/477
> >
> > The arm fixmap patch is currently in the akpm tree and has been
> > part of linux-next for a while.
> >
> > This is version 4 of the patch series. These patches (and underlying
> > fixmap patches) may be found at:
> >
> > git://github.com/mosalter/linux.git (early-ioremap-v4 branch)
>
> There have been no comments on this patch series over the past
> two weeks. I'd like to get it into linux-next for some wider
> testing and eventually into 3.15. Is there something I can do
> to help it along?
I'd suggest spitting the core part out from the arch-specific parts. That
way, the core part can merged independently and architectures can move over
as they see fit. It also signals (at least to me) that, "hey, I should
probably review this" whilst my current stance is "there's a whole load of
stuff under mm/ that needs to be acked first".
If you put the whole thing into next, you just run the risk of conflicts
with all the arch trees.
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-25 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-12 20:56 [PATCH v4 0/6] generic early_ioremap support Mark Salter
2014-02-12 20:56 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] mm: create generic early_ioremap() support Mark Salter
2014-02-12 20:56 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] arm: add early_ioremap support Mark Salter
2014-02-26 5:48 ` Rob Herring
2014-02-26 9:38 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-02-26 14:59 ` Mark Salter
2014-02-26 15:56 ` Rob Herring
2014-02-12 20:56 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] arm64: initialize pgprot info earlier in boot Mark Salter
2014-02-12 20:56 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] arm64: add early_ioremap support Mark Salter
2014-02-25 14:10 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] generic " Mark Salter
2014-02-25 18:30 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2014-02-25 18:45 ` Mark Salter
2014-02-25 19:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-25 23:04 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-02-25 23:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-03 22:29 ` Mark Salter
2014-03-04 1:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140225183012.GA27164@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).