From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mturquette@linaro.org (Mike Turquette) Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:42:29 -0800 Subject: [PATCH v2 2/4] clk: at91: propagate rate change on system clks In-Reply-To: <1391589458-28018-3-git-send-email-jjhiblot@traphandler.com> References: <1391589458-28018-1-git-send-email-jjhiblot@traphandler.com> <1391589458-28018-3-git-send-email-jjhiblot@traphandler.com> Message-ID: <20140227004229.12081.25317@quantum> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Quoting Jean-Jacques Hiblot (2014-02-05 00:37:36) > From: Boris BREZILLON > > System clks are just gates, and thus do not provide any rate operations. > Authorize clk rate change to be propagated to system clk parents. > > Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON > --- > drivers/clk/at91/clk-system.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-system.c b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-system.c > index 8f7c043..a98557b 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-system.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-system.c > @@ -84,7 +84,8 @@ at91_clk_register_system(struct at91_pmc *pmc, const char *name, > * (see drivers/memory) which would request and enable the ddrck clock. > * When this is done we will be able to remove CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED flag. > */ > - init.flags = CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED; > + init.flags = CLK_SET_RATE_GATE | CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | Just wanted to do a quick sanity check here. Do you really need CLK_SET_RATE_GATE? Otherwise these patches look fine. Regards, Mike > + CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED; > > sys->id = id; > sys->hw.init = &init; > -- > 1.8.5.2 >