From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wsa@the-dreams.de (Wolfram Sang) Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 16:07:46 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 3/4] clk: shmobile: add CPG driver for rz-platforms In-Reply-To: <1460103.hdWs652aMT@avalon> References: <1393621768-12568-1-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de> <2207635.bd10VfTU6U@avalon> <20140305135431.GA7985@katana> <1460103.hdWs652aMT@avalon> Message-ID: <20140305150746.GA9228@katana> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > That's fine with me (although given the low complexity I would probably have > gone directly to supporting both clocks) as long as we can ensure both forward We need to wait for GPIO support anyhow to get it real. > and backward compatibility. Should we give a name to the clock input through > the clock-names property for that reason ? Not needed IMO. > > Note that the devkit will most likely be the only board ever with a > > selectable root clock. > > Most probably, but that's no reason not to support it :-) Not in itself. Yet a low demand might be, a demand of 0 surely is ;) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: