From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jason@lakedaemon.net (Jason Cooper) Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 19:16:57 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 0/4] ARM: mvebu: Device Tree updates for Armada XP boards In-Reply-To: <20140307001001.GA13690@arch.cereza> References: <1393951022-18114-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <20140306200543.GG1872@titan.lakedaemon.net> <20140307001001.GA13690@arch.cereza> Message-ID: <20140307001657.GM1872@titan.lakedaemon.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 09:10:01PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > On Mar 06, Jason Cooper wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 05:36:58PM +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > This set of commits updates the Armada XP DB and Armada XP GP Device > > > Trees to work with the newest DT capable bootloaders from Marvell that > > > remap internal registers at 0xf1000000 and move the MBus Window base > > > address to 0xf0000000. > > > > > > Also, the last commit updates the available amount of RAM on the > > > Armada XP Matrix board. > > > > > > Thomas > > > > > > Thomas Petazzoni (4): > > > ARM: mvebu: change the default PCIe apertures for Armada 370/XP > > > ARM: mvebu: switch the Armada XP DB to use internal registers at > > > 0xf1000000 > > > ARM: mvebu: switch the Armada XP GP to use internal registers at > > > 0xf1000000 > > > ARM: mvebu: the Armada XP Matrix board has 4 GB > > > > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-370-xp.dtsi | 4 ++-- > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-xp-db.dts | 13 +++++++++++-- > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-xp-gp.dts | 22 ++++++++++++++++------ > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-xp-matrix.dts | 7 ++++++- > > > 4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > > > Whole series applied to mvebu/dt. > > > > fyi - we only have one more day of -next (tonight, 7pm US East Coast > > time) before -rc6 drops. > > > > I'm comfortable sending a lightly tested mvebu/dt pull request with all > > the stuff submitted in the last couple days, but I fear there isn't > > enough testing time before arm-soc stops taking pull requests. > > > > I'm particularly concerned about the watchdog changes and the coherency > > Hm... I wasn't really aiming v3.15, as I thought it was already too late. Ok, great. I just wanted to make sure everybody was on the same page. I'll hold off on pulling those two in until v3.15 is completely out of our hands (all in arm-soc and pinctrl). > On the other side, if we can get someone to review the changes and someone > to double-check them on 370/XP/Kirkwood, you could pull it soon enough? Now, now, I wasn't _asking_ for *more* work. ;-) > Anyway, it's not a big deal if it gets pulled in v3.16. We are already > doing *a lot* of mvebu movement in this release, IMHO. Agreed. thx, Jason.