From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wsa@the-dreams.de (Wolfram Sang) Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 17:47:41 +0100 Subject: [PATCH V3 00/12] CCF support for Renesas r7s72100 In-Reply-To: <1552759.qGZNIXqrb1@avalon> References: <1394208048-32495-1-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de> <2368991.bjBJjms8qn@avalon> <20140307162946.GG28943@katana> <1552759.qGZNIXqrb1@avalon> Message-ID: <20140307164741.GJ28943@katana> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > > That would have saved only 2 lines since we need the workaround anyhow > > (MTU2) and would break the incremental approach of this series somewhat. > > I'd like to keep it. > > It would have saved one patch. If Simon needs to apply CCF support separately > I'm fine with that approach, but if both changes are applied at the same time > the SCIF patches could go in first. Which one would be saved? We need to workaround anyhow (patch 5) and some scif cleanup besides the workaround is needed, too (patch 7). No? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: