From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: s.trumtrar@pengutronix.de (Steffen Trumtrar) Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014 16:37:30 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] ath6kl: sdio: fix system panic when doing wifi stress test In-Reply-To: <87a9d0oqbz.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> References: <1384221185-8645-1-git-send-email-r64343@freescale.com> <87k3fvjvjg.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <20140307093813.GA28728@pengutronix.de> <87a9d0oqbz.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Message-ID: <20140308153730.GA27506@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 01:57:36PM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote: > Hi Steffen, > > Steffen Trumtrar writes: > > >> > Does the patch below help? It would also fix the corruption with > >> > scat_q_depth. Please note that I have only compile tested it. And I might > >> > have also missed something important, so please review it carefully. > >> > >> Yes, Firstly, I have looked at the asm code and the compiler(gcc 4.8.1) works correctly after applying > >> the following patch. Secondly, I have tested the patch with compiler(gcc 4.8.1) on the real HW, and it > >> works fine too. Without the patch, the kernel crash will happen 100%. > >> > >> Thus, for the patch: > >> > >> Acked-by: Jason Liu > >> Tested-by: Jason Liu > > [...] > > > What happend with this? If I look in mainline, I don't find it. At > > least the reording of the struct fields looks as if one definitely > > wants to have that. > > It seems that I forgot to submit this properly, sorry about that. I did > it now: > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/ath6kl/2014-March/000000.html > \o/ Thank you. Regards, Steffen -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |