From: mporter@linaro.org (Matt Porter)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] regulator: add bcm590xx regulator driver
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 11:47:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140311154750.GI25092@beef> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140219045232.GD2669@sirena.org.uk>
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 01:52:32PM +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 06:17:10PM -0500, Matt Porter wrote:
>
> > +static struct of_device_id bcm590xx_of_match[] = {
> > + { .compatible = "brcm,bcm59056-regs", },
> > + { }
> > +};
>
> This looks pretty much OK however I am in general suspicious of MFDs
> that have subdevices like this in the DT - it doesn't seem like this is
> a reusable device which can appear anywhere else so you're pretty much
> just representing the way that Linux splits things up here rather than a
> reusable IP that can reasonably have a separate binding.
>
> If you had a binding which did something like enumerate the individual
> IP blocks as individual devices that'd be more interesting, I could see
> for example that a different PMIC might have a different set of register
> compatible regulator IPs laid out. It looks like that might be doable,
> but it's in no way essential.
Ok I dropped this for v3 in favor of using mfd_add_device() and having
the regulator driver reference the of_node from the parent device.
-Matt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140311/da50f352/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-11 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-18 23:17 [PATCH v2 0/5] BCM59056 PMU regulator support Matt Porter
2014-02-18 23:17 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] mfd: add bcm590xx pmu DT binding Matt Porter
2014-02-19 4:47 ` Mark Brown
2014-03-11 15:49 ` Matt Porter
2014-02-18 23:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] mfd: add bcm590xx pmu driver Matt Porter
2014-02-19 4:46 ` Mark Brown
2014-03-11 15:50 ` Matt Porter
2014-02-18 23:17 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] regulator: add bcm590xx regulator driver Matt Porter
2014-02-19 4:52 ` Mark Brown
2014-03-11 15:47 ` Matt Porter [this message]
2014-02-18 23:17 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] ARM: configs: bcm_defconfig: enable bcm590xx regulator support Matt Porter
2014-02-18 23:17 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] ARM: dts: add bcm590xx pmu support and enable for bcm28155-ap Matt Porter
2014-02-19 4:44 ` Mark Brown
2014-03-11 15:50 ` Matt Porter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140311154750.GI25092@beef \
--to=mporter@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).