From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 13:09:50 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] mfd: sec-core: Add of_compatible strings for MFD cells In-Reply-To: <1394714991.20773.5.camel@AMDC1943> References: <1394703425-6462-1-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> <1394703425-6462-3-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> <53219F80.9000300@samsung.com> <1394712996.20773.1.camel@AMDC1943> <5321A6A2.9070509@samsung.com> <1394714991.20773.5.camel@AMDC1943> Message-ID: <20140313130950.GB10356@lee--X1> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > > >> Are these compatible strings documented anywhere? > > > > > > The "-clk" compatible strings are (in next patch). The "-rtc" and > > > "-regulators" are not. > > > > Hmm, this doesn't sound good. > > > > > Actually they aren't also used by child driver (each child driver parses > > > from parent of_node). > > > > Do you need to add compatible strings to mfd_cell entries of such cells > > then? > > From my point of view there isn't any special need for them (except for > clk). > > Dear Lee, > > Do you wish to have these compatibles for all of child drivers even when > they aren't used directly by them? If yes then probably I should > document them. It's your call, either remove the unused ones or document them all. I don't really mind either way. In the previous version I asked if there was any reason why you weren't applying compatible strings to the other cells; "subordinate drivers don't use them" is a perfectly reasonable reason. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog