From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:13:53 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] i2c: sunxi: Change i2c compatibles In-Reply-To: <20140313173128.GC25870@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1394710643-3411-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <1394710643-3411-2-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <20140313173128.GC25870@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> Message-ID: <20140314091353.GK2815@lukather> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 05:31:28PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:37:22AM +0000, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > The Allwinner A10 compatibles were following a slightly different compatible > > patterns than the rest of the SoCs for historical reasons. Move to the other > > pattern for consistency across all Allwinner Socs. > > Dropping support for the existing string breaks existing DTBs. Is > this really necessary? I added new ones at first, and Rob said it wasn't worth it since we were a "work-in-progress" platform. http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-February/229438.html -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: