* leds-atmel-pwm and atmel-pwm-bl removal
@ 2014-03-14 19:49 Alexandre Belloni
2014-03-16 17:28 ` Hans-Christian Egtvedt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre Belloni @ 2014-03-14 19:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Hi,
With the new generic pwm framework and the pwm-atmel driver using it, we
don't need leds-atmel-pwm or atmel-pwm-bl anymore. However, a few boards
are still using those:
arch/arm/mach-at91/board-sam9263ek.c
arch/arm/mach-at91/board-sam9m10g45ek.c
arch/avr32/boards/atngw100/mrmt.c
arch/avr32/boards/merisc/setup.c
arch/avr32/boards/favr-32/setup.c
Some other avr32 boards are compiling it as a module but don't seem to
make any use of it.
I will take care of the mach-at91 boards and I can test on those. I can
do the same for the avr32 boards but I won't be able to test (only
to compile). Is anyone of you interested in testing those changes ?
I couldn't reach the initial authors of those files...
Could we simply remove the driver from the avr32 boards ? I'm under the
impression that they don't get much interest anyway, since april 2009,
I only see tree wide changes and I can't believe they didn't get broken
a way or another.
Regards,
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* leds-atmel-pwm and atmel-pwm-bl removal
2014-03-14 19:49 leds-atmel-pwm and atmel-pwm-bl removal Alexandre Belloni
@ 2014-03-16 17:28 ` Hans-Christian Egtvedt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Hans-Christian Egtvedt @ 2014-03-16 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Around Fri 14 Mar 2014 20:49:30 +0100 or thereabout, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With the new generic pwm framework and the pwm-atmel driver using it, we
> don't need leds-atmel-pwm or atmel-pwm-bl anymore. However, a few boards
> are still using those:
>
> arch/arm/mach-at91/board-sam9263ek.c
> arch/arm/mach-at91/board-sam9m10g45ek.c
> arch/avr32/boards/atngw100/mrmt.c
> arch/avr32/boards/merisc/setup.c
> arch/avr32/boards/favr-32/setup.c
>
> Some other avr32 boards are compiling it as a module but don't seem to
> make any use of it.
>
> I will take care of the mach-at91 boards and I can test on those. I can
> do the same for the avr32 boards but I won't be able to test (only
> to compile). Is anyone of you interested in testing those changes ?
mrmt.c is an addon board for NGW100 IIRC, I do not have one.
favr-32 is a board I do not really recall where originated from, I do not
have one either.
> I couldn't reach the initial authors of those files...
>
> Could we simply remove the driver from the avr32 boards ? I'm under the
> impression that they don't get much interest anyway, since april 2009,
> I only see tree wide changes and I can't believe they didn't get broken
> a way or another.
I'll be happy to accept a patch that removes the use of the non-generic
driver, preferably compile tested.
--
mvh
Hans-Christian Egtvedt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-03-16 17:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-03-14 19:49 leds-atmel-pwm and atmel-pwm-bl removal Alexandre Belloni
2014-03-16 17:28 ` Hans-Christian Egtvedt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).