From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mturquette@linaro.org (Mike Turquette) Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 21:01:49 -0700 Subject: [GIT PULL 5/6] Samsung PM updates for v3.15 In-Reply-To: References: <8259832.260591393840570438.JavaMail.weblogic@epml16> <20140309183523.GD22881@quad.lixom.net> <531CFA28.9020600@gmail.com> <01d001cf3ccc$39f339b0$add9ad10$@samsung.com> Message-ID: <20140319040149.30995.80279@quantum> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Quoting Olof Johansson (2014-03-10 19:52:01) > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > Olof Johansson wrote: > >> > >> >> Hi, > >> >> > >> >> I don't see a single cc or acked-by line from Mike Turquette here. I'll > >> >> hold > >> >> off until he's had a chance to take a look at these ones; I suspect > >> >> they'll be > >> >> fine since it's mostly code refactoring though. > >> > > >> > > >> > I guess I should have ACKed them too, but it felt kind of strange to ACK > >> my > >> > own patches. ;) > >> > > >> > Anyway, for all samsung-clk patches: > >> > > >> > Acked-by: Tomasz Figa > >> > >> Yeah, self-acking doesn't make much sense. :) > >> > >> I'm mostly worried about patches touching other subsystems without the > >> other maintainer being aware of it or having reviewed them. As I said, > >> these mostly look like refactorings but it's still good habit. > >> > > OK, agreed, I think Mike knew about that though. Let's wait for Mike's > > response. > > > > BTW, should I sort out the branch again if Mike gives ack on that? > > If I hear from Mike that he's OK with it then I can merge it, no need to rebase. Acked-by: Mike Turquette > > > -Olof