From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 11/15] arm64: add EFI stub
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 10:35:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140319103521.GD2214@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140318222105.GA11178@obsidianresearch.com>
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 10:21:05PM +0000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 02:48:30PM -0700, Roy Franz wrote:
>
> > > It isn't clear to me if UEFI does cache flushing at ExitBootServices
> > > time, but even so, at least stack use will get cached between then and
> > > the kernel entry point. The stub could conceivably get its hands on the
> > > EFI memmap and invalidate dcache using address ranges from UEFI memory
> > > descriptors so maybe that is the way we should do it.
>
> > I looked at the UEFI spec and there is no mention of cache flushing
> > in ExitBootServices(), so it seems it is up to the OS to do any
> > cache management.
>
> Something to think about: On mvebu we recently confirmed a situation
> where turning off the L1 cache is not sufficient for booting. The L2
> cache must also be completely off and disabled prior to jumping in to
> the kernel.
>
> The issue is the decompressor turns the L1 cache back on, and if the
> L2 is also enabled at this point then it gets filled with
> decompression data. Things go wrong from here because after
> decompression the L1 dcache is switched off, but the L2 isn't
> flush-invalidated.
>
> So now the L2 holds writeback data and uncached reads return garbage,
> and/or the L2 misses the uncached writes (eg relocation fixup) and
> becomes inconsistent with memory. Either case gives a black screen
> crash at boot.
>
> Fundementally if the L2 doesn't monitor uncached read/writes then it
> will cause a big problem.
Yes, that's a problem on (ARMv7) SoCs booting in non-secure mode with
external L2 already enabled. For ARMv8 at least, the SoCs I've seen with
external caches detect the data cache by MVA ops.
> Thus, if the UEFI calls the sub with the caches on, and the stub
> doesn't know enough to turn off the L2 then you might not be able to
> turn the dcache off at all. :(
>
> On ARM64 at least the L1 cache ops are standardized so maybe ARM64
> could keep the mmu+caches enabled during boot and do the L1
> d-flush/i-inval required for instruction coherency?
We thought about keeping the MMU on from EFI_STUB into the kernel but it
gets messier since UEFI has different MMU settings. So with some sane
external cache, we could get away with flushing a range.
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-19 10:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-13 22:46 [PATCH v2 00/14] UEFI support for arm(64) Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 01/15] efi: delete stray ARM ifdef Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 02/15] efi: x86: Improve cmdline conversion Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 03/15] efi: create memory map iteration helper Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 04/15] lib: add fdt_empty_tree.c Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] efi: add helper function to get UEFI params from FDT Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 06/15] doc: efi-stub.txt updates for ARM Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:47 ` [PATCH v2 07/15] efi: Add shared printk wrapper for consistent prefixing Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:47 ` [PATCH v2 08/15] efi: Add get_dram_base() helper function Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:47 ` [PATCH v2 09/15] efi: Add shared FDT related functions for ARM/ARM64 Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:47 ` [PATCH v2 10/15] arm64: Add function to create identity mappings Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:47 ` [PATCH v2 11/15] arm64: add EFI stub Leif Lindholm
2014-03-18 12:09 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-03-18 14:40 ` Mark Salter
2014-03-18 18:28 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-03-18 21:40 ` Mark Salter
2014-03-18 21:48 ` Roy Franz
2014-03-18 22:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-03-19 10:35 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2014-03-19 10:57 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-03-19 15:13 ` Mark Salter
2014-03-19 16:01 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-03-19 16:46 ` Mark Salter
2014-03-13 22:47 ` [PATCH v2 12/15] doc: arm64: add description of EFI stub support Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:47 ` [PATCH v2 13/15] arm64: add EFI runtime services Leif Lindholm
2014-03-18 12:34 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-03-18 14:16 ` Mark Salter
2014-03-18 17:36 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-03-13 22:47 ` [PATCH v2 14/15] doc: arm: add UEFI support documentation Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:47 ` [PATCH v2 15/15] efi/arm64: ignore dtb= when UEFI SecureBoot is enabled Leif Lindholm
2014-03-17 22:24 ` [PATCH v2 00/14] UEFI support for arm(64) Matt Fleming
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140319103521.GD2214@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).