From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: computersforpeace@gmail.com (Brian Norris) Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 00:30:21 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 11/35] mtd: st_spi_fsm: Use device size to determine address width In-Reply-To: <1392735362-1245-12-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> References: <1392735362-1245-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1392735362-1245-12-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> Message-ID: <20140320073021.GC31517@norris-Latitude-E6410> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 02:55:38PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > Take some known parameters, namely size and number of sectors and use > them to determine weather a device can support 32bit addressing or not. > If it can, set the associated flash capability flag for latter use. > > Acked-by Angus Clark > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones > --- > drivers/mtd/devices/st_spi_fsm.c | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/devices/st_spi_fsm.c b/drivers/mtd/devices/st_spi_fsm.c > index 68fa12e..1d7a13a0 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/devices/st_spi_fsm.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/devices/st_spi_fsm.c > @@ -670,6 +670,10 @@ static int stfsm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return -ENODEV; > fsm->info = info; > > + /* Use device size to determine address width */ > + if (info->sector_size * info->n_sectors > 0xFFFFFF) Shouldn't you compare: if (info->sector_size * info->n_sectors > 0x1000000) ? A device of size 0x1000000 can be addressed completely with only the lower 24 bits. > + info->flags |= FLASH_FLAG_32BIT_ADDR; > + > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, fsm); > > fsm->mtd.dev.parent = &pdev->dev; Brian