From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 18:22:56 +0000
Subject: [GIT PULL] ARM: kprobes: big-endian support
In-Reply-To: <5335BBB1.60402@linaro.org>
References: <52D3D784.2000600@linaro.org> <53053769.5090100@linaro.org>
 <5332AB5A.90109@linaro.org> <20140328112841.GF7528@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <5335BBB1.60402@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20140328182256.GO7528@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 08:13:05PM +0200, Taras Kondratiuk wrote:
> On 03/28/2014 01:28 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:26:34PM +0200, Taras Kondratiuk wrote:
> >> On 02/20/2014 12:59 AM, Taras Kondratiuk wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Russell,
> >>
> >> Is there any issue with this pull request?
> >> Should I do something to get it pulled?
> > 
> > There's nothing wrong, apart from me being far too busy hacking on really
> > crap code to care about reading much email - which means that lots of
> > email simply just gets buried and lost.
> > 
> > There is now a problem with this pull - it conflicts very badly with Dave
> > Long's uprobes code, which I've already pulled, so much so that I'm not
> > happy to do the conflict resolution since I know nothing about this code,
> > and it's a feature I don't make any use of.
> 
> I've rebased it onto your for-next branch. Kprobes are functional
> in LE and BE. I'll send an updated pull request after verifying uprobes.

That's not going to work.  for-next is an unstable branch - all the
merge commits there get regenerated on a fairly regular basis.

A better solution would be to base your patches on top of Dave Long's
changes, which can be found at

 git://git.linaro.org/people/dave.long/linux uprobes-v7

and should have an ID of c7edc9e326d5.

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: now at 9.7Mbps down 460kbps up... slowly
improving, and getting towards what was expected from it.