From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wsa@the-dreams.de (Wolfram Sang) Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 23:51:39 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v5 2/2] i2c: New bus driver for the Qualcomm QUP I2C controller In-Reply-To: <20140314180038.GT18529@joshc.qualcomm.com> References: <1394762863-12154-1-git-send-email-bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com> <1394762863-12154-3-git-send-email-bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com> <20140314180038.GT18529@joshc.qualcomm.com> Message-ID: <20140328225139.GC29200@katana> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > General i2c question: is there a reason why the core isn't responsible > for ensuring a device is not suspended before invoking ->master_xfer > (and smbus_xfer)? Can't think of one right now. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: