From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 11:55:49 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 58/75] ARM: l2c: omap2: remove cache size override In-Reply-To: <20140328222159.GB30388@atomide.com> References: <20140328151249.GJ7528@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20140328160358.GG24308@atomide.com> <20140328210945.GU7528@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20140328222159.GB30388@atomide.com> Message-ID: <20140331105549.GF27282@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 03:21:59PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Russell King - ARM Linux [140328 14:13]: > > On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 09:03:59AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > * Russell King [140328 08:22]: > > > > > > Missing description? > > > > No, I just got sick and tired of trying to write descriptions for these > > patches. Many of these I regard as totally unnecessary patches that > > should never have been required had platform folk not invested in > > cargo cult programming. > > > > Given the number of patches I'm presently dealing with in my tree right > > now, I don't actually have time to even follow the mailing lists at the > > moment. If I were to properly describe all of these patches, I'd > > probably be at this for another few weeks. > > Heh well I have a feeling you'll add some generic description anyways :) If I end up merging each of these patches removingthe cache override together into one commit touching many of the SoCs, then yes. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: now at 9.7Mbps down 460kbps up... slowly improving, and getting towards what was expected from it.