From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: shawn.guo@freescale.com (Shawn Guo)
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 21:20:11 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] ARM i.MX51: Add Digi ConnectCore devicetree
In-Reply-To: <1396443365.215796052@f367.i.mail.ru>
References: <1396075706-25384-1-git-send-email-shc_work@mail.ru>
 <1396440407.634334403@f167.i.mail.ru>
 <20140402124710.GC10283@dragon>
 <1396443365.215796052@f367.i.mail.ru>
Message-ID: <20140402132009.GK8753@dragon>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 04:56:05PM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> Wed, 2 Apr 2014 20:47:11 +0800 ?? Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@freescale.com>:
> > On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 04:06:47PM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> > > > > > > +&weim {
> > > > > > > +	pinctrl-names = "default";
> > > > > > > +	pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_weim>;
> > > > > > > +	status = "okay";
> > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > +	lan9221: lan9221 at ce000000 {
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > How does 'ce000000' in the node name comes?
> > > > > 
> > > > > This is a WEIM CS5 start address.
> > > > 
> > > > Hmm, shouldn't the unit-address come from the 'reg' property of the node
> > > > somehow?
> > > 
> > > I'm not sure. Here is the real physical address of the device, in the case of
> > > using an address from the "reg", we get zero address.
> > > 
> > > Just imagine, that we have a second LAN chip on the start of CS4.
> > > Two identical devices?
> > 
> > The node name should be 'lan9221 at 5,0' and 'lan9221 at 4,0' respectively.
> 
> Well, we can do so. You want me to update existing DTS for WEIM nodes?

Yes, please.

Shawn