* OMAP baseline test results for v3.14
@ 2014-04-02 16:03 Paul Walmsley
2014-04-02 16:21 ` Tony Lindgren
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Paul Walmsley @ 2014-04-02 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v3.14.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.14/20140402004448/
Test summary
------------
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only,
omap1_defconfig_5912osk_only
Build: uImage+dtb:
Pass ( 9/ 9): omap2plus_defconfig_am33xx_only/am335x-bone,
omap2plus_defconfig/omap4-panda,
omap2plus_defconfig/omap4-panda-es,
omap2plus_defconfig/am3517-evm,
omap2plus_defconfig/omap2430-sdp,
omap2plus_defconfig/omap3-beagle,
omap2plus_defconfig/omap3-beagle-xm,
omap2plus_defconfig/omap3-evm-37xx,
omap2plus_defconfig/omap4-var-som
Build: zImage:
Pass (14/14): multi_v7_defconfig, omap2plus_defconfig,
omap2plus_defconfig_am33xx_only,
omap2plus_defconfig_2430sdp_only,
omap2plus_defconfig_cpupm, omap2plus_defconfig_no_pm,
omap2plus_defconfig_n800_only_a,
omap2plus_defconfig_n800_multi_omap2xxx,
omap2plus_defconfig_omap2_4_only,
omap2plus_defconfig_omap3_4_only,
rmk_omap3430_ldp_allnoconfig,
rmk_omap3430_ldp_oldconfig,
rmk_omap4430_sdp_allnoconfig,
rmk_omap4430_sdp_oldconfig
Boot to userspace:
FAIL ( 1/12): 2430sdp
skip ( 2/12): 5912osk, cmt3517
Pass ( 9/12): 3517evm, 3530es3beagle, 3730beaglexm, 37xxevm,
4430es2panda, 4460pandaes, am335xbone, am335xbonelt,
4460varsomom
PM: chip retention via suspend:
FAIL ( 3/ 7): 2430sdp, 4430es2panda, 4460varsomom
Pass ( 4/ 7): 3530es3beagle, 3730beaglexm, 37xxevm, 4460pandaes
PM: chip retention via dynamic idle:
FAIL ( 7/ 7): 2430sdp, 3530es3beagle, 3730beaglexm, 37xxevm,
4430es2panda, 4460pandaes, 4460varsomom
PM: chip off except CORE via suspend:
FAIL ( 1/ 1): 3730beaglexm
PM: chip off except CORE via dynamic idle:
FAIL ( 1/ 1): 3730beaglexm
PM: chip off via suspend:
FAIL ( 5/ 5): 3530es3beagle, 37xxevm, 4430es2panda, 4460pandaes,
4460varsomom
PM: chip off via dynamic idle:
FAIL ( 5/ 5): 3530es3beagle, 37xxevm, 4430es2panda, 4460pandaes,
4460varsomom
vmlinux object size
(delta in bytes from test_v3.14-rc8 (b098d6726bbfb94c06d6e1097466187afddae61f)):
text data bss total kernel
+1160 +88 +8 +1256 omap1_defconfig
+1160 +88 +8 +1256 omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
+1128 +88 +8 +1224 omap1_defconfig_5912osk_only
+520 +136 0 +656 multi_v7_defconfig
+720 +64 0 +784 omap2plus_defconfig
+592 +96 +32 +720 omap2plus_defconfig_2430sdp_only
+676 +56 0 +732 omap2plus_defconfig_am33xx_only
+648 +72 0 +720 omap2plus_defconfig_am43xx_only
+720 +128 0 +848 omap2plus_defconfig_cpupm
+720 +64 0 +784 omap2plus_defconfig_dra7xx_only
+416 +88 0 +504 omap2plus_defconfig_n800_multi_omap2xxx
+384 +24 0 +408 omap2plus_defconfig_n800_only_a
+656 +72 0 +728 omap2plus_defconfig_no_pm
+656 +72 0 +728 omap2plus_defconfig_omap2_4_only
+720 +64 0 +784 omap2plus_defconfig_omap3_4_only
+656 +64 0 +720 omap2plus_defconfig_omap5_only
+424 +72 -100 +396 rmk_omap3430_ldp_allnoconfig
+480 +88 0 +568 rmk_omap3430_ldp_oldconfig
+464 +76 -108 +432 rmk_omap4430_sdp_allnoconfig
+480 +56 0 +536 rmk_omap4430_sdp_oldconfig
Boot-time memory difference
(delta in bytes from test_v3.14-rc8 (b098d6726bbfb94c06d6e1097466187afddae61f))
avail rsrvd high freed board kconfig
(no differences)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* OMAP baseline test results for v3.14
2014-04-02 16:03 OMAP baseline test results for v3.14 Paul Walmsley
@ 2014-04-02 16:21 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-04-02 16:21 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-04-02 16:32 ` Paul Walmsley
0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Tony Lindgren @ 2014-04-02 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
* Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> [140402 09:07]:
>
> Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v3.14.
> Logs and other details at:
>
> http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.14/20140402004448/
>
> Boot to userspace:
> FAIL ( 1/12): 2430sdp
Is this a new regression with MMC? Looks like your boot log for this
ends with "Waiting for root device /dev/mmcblk0p1...".
Regards,
Tony
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* OMAP baseline test results for v3.14
2014-04-02 16:21 ` Tony Lindgren
@ 2014-04-02 16:21 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-04-02 16:33 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-04-02 16:32 ` Paul Walmsley
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Felipe Balbi @ 2014-04-02 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 09:21:03AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> [140402 09:07]:
> >
> > Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v3.14.
> > Logs and other details at:
> >
> > http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.14/20140402004448/
> >
> > Boot to userspace:
> > FAIL ( 1/12): 2430sdp
>
> Is this a new regression with MMC? Looks like your boot log for this
> ends with "Waiting for root device /dev/mmcblk0p1...".
Nishanth already posted about this a few days ago, see [1]
[1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=139637044425644&w=2
--
balbi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140402/327b6b64/attachment.sig>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* OMAP baseline test results for v3.14
2014-04-02 16:21 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-04-02 16:21 ` Felipe Balbi
@ 2014-04-02 16:32 ` Paul Walmsley
2014-04-02 16:35 ` Tony Lindgren
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Paul Walmsley @ 2014-04-02 16:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Wed, 2 Apr 2014, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> [140402 09:07]:
> >
> > Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v3.14.
> > Logs and other details at:
> >
> > http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.14/20140402004448/
> >
> > Boot to userspace:
> > FAIL ( 1/12): 2430sdp
>
> Is this a new regression with MMC? Looks like your boot log for this
> ends with "Waiting for root device /dev/mmcblk0p1...".
It's new since v3.14-rc1:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg306448.html
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg306454.html
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg306455.html
- Paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* OMAP baseline test results for v3.14
2014-04-02 16:21 ` Felipe Balbi
@ 2014-04-02 16:33 ` Tony Lindgren
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Tony Lindgren @ 2014-04-02 16:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
* Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> [140402 09:27]:
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 09:21:03AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> [140402 09:07]:
> > >
> > > Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v3.14.
> > > Logs and other details at:
> > >
> > > http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.14/20140402004448/
> > >
> > > Boot to userspace:
> > > FAIL ( 1/12): 2430sdp
> >
> > Is this a new regression with MMC? Looks like your boot log for this
> > ends with "Waiting for root device /dev/mmcblk0p1...".
>
> Nishanth already posted about this a few days ago, see [1]
>
> [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=139637044425644&w=2
OK thanks.
Tony
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* OMAP baseline test results for v3.14
2014-04-02 16:32 ` Paul Walmsley
@ 2014-04-02 16:35 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-04-02 16:59 ` menon.nishanth at gmail.com
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Tony Lindgren @ 2014-04-02 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
* Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> [140402 09:36]:
> On Wed, 2 Apr 2014, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>
> > * Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> [140402 09:07]:
> > >
> > > Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v3.14.
> > > Logs and other details at:
> > >
> > > http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.14/20140402004448/
> > >
> > > Boot to userspace:
> > > FAIL ( 1/12): 2430sdp
> >
> > Is this a new regression with MMC? Looks like your boot log for this
> > ends with "Waiting for root device /dev/mmcblk0p1...".
>
> It's new since v3.14-rc1:
>
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg306448.html
>
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg306454.html
>
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg306455.html
OK looks like I never noticed that one before. Probably
because of NFSroot.
Tony
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* OMAP baseline test results for v3.14
2014-04-02 16:35 ` Tony Lindgren
@ 2014-04-02 16:59 ` menon.nishanth at gmail.com
2014-04-02 17:15 ` Tony Lindgren
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: menon.nishanth at gmail.com @ 2014-04-02 16:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> * Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> [140402 09:36]:
>> On Wed, 2 Apr 2014, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>
>> > * Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> [140402 09:07]:
>> > >
>> > > Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v3.14.
>> > > Logs and other details at:
>> > >
>> > > http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.14/20140402004448/
>> > >
>> > > Boot to userspace:
>> > > FAIL ( 1/12): 2430sdp
>> >
>> > Is this a new regression with MMC? Looks like your boot log for this
>> > ends with "Waiting for root device /dev/mmcblk0p1...".
>>
>> It's new since v3.14-rc1:
>>
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg306448.html
>>
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg306454.html
>>
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg306455.html
>
> OK looks like I never noticed that one before. Probably
> because of NFSroot.
Paul uses MMC filesystem, I use NFS. As Felipe Pointed out as well, I
did rootcause MMC filesystem mount issue here:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=139637044425644&w=2
NFS does work for me on 3.14 tag http://slexy.org/raw/s20plaLoaT (on SDP2430)
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* OMAP baseline test results for v3.14
2014-04-02 16:59 ` menon.nishanth at gmail.com
@ 2014-04-02 17:15 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-04-03 13:32 ` Paolo Pisati
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Tony Lindgren @ 2014-04-02 17:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
* menon.nishanth at gmail.com <menon.nishanth@gmail.com> [140402 10:03]:
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> > * Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> [140402 09:36]:
> >> On Wed, 2 Apr 2014, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >>
> >> > * Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> [140402 09:07]:
> >> > >
> >> > > Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v3.14.
> >> > > Logs and other details at:
> >> > >
> >> > > http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.14/20140402004448/
> >> > >
> >> > > Boot to userspace:
> >> > > FAIL ( 1/12): 2430sdp
> >> >
> >> > Is this a new regression with MMC? Looks like your boot log for this
> >> > ends with "Waiting for root device /dev/mmcblk0p1...".
> >>
> >> It's new since v3.14-rc1:
> >>
> >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg306448.html
> >>
> >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg306454.html
> >>
> >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg306455.html
> >
> > OK looks like I never noticed that one before. Probably
> > because of NFSroot.
> Paul uses MMC filesystem, I use NFS. As Felipe Pointed out as well, I
> did rootcause MMC filesystem mount issue here:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=139637044425644&w=2
Balaji, care to take a look at the issue for MMC? It may
be already fixed in next with the PBIAS handling?
> NFS does work for me on 3.14 tag http://slexy.org/raw/s20plaLoaT (on SDP2430)
Yes that's good.
Tony
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* OMAP baseline test results for v3.14
2014-04-02 17:15 ` Tony Lindgren
@ 2014-04-03 13:32 ` Paolo Pisati
2014-04-03 13:44 ` Balaji T K
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Pisati @ 2014-04-03 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 10:15:13AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > Paul uses MMC filesystem, I use NFS. As Felipe Pointed out as well, I
> > did rootcause MMC filesystem mount issue here:
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=139637044425644&w=2
>
> Balaji, care to take a look at the issue for MMC? It may
> be already fixed in next with the PBIAS handling?
it may be related (or not), but i'm experiencing reboot issues with 3.13/.14 on
omap4 (panda), and after a bisection i found out that reverting
commit e002264f7e45d7661b237045577052fd0b40f89c
Author: Balaji T K <balajitk <at> ti.com>
Date: Mon Oct 21 00:25:18 2013 +0530
mmc: omap_hsmmc: Fix pbias_disable for omap4
pbias_disable is set to protect the mmc pbias i/o cells in DT boot
by preventing voltage switch. Currently pbias_disable is enabled only
for omap3 and not for omap4 due to reg_offset difference of 0x100.
Enable pbias_disable for omap4+ too by using res->start
which does not include the reg_offset.
Signed-off-by: Balaji T K <balajitk <at> ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb <at> laptop.org>
made it go away: can you point me to those pbias handling patches (i guess
something about dt-booting handling pbias correctly now)?
Root on mmc in my case.
--
bye,
p.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* OMAP baseline test results for v3.14
2014-04-03 13:32 ` Paolo Pisati
@ 2014-04-03 13:44 ` Balaji T K
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Balaji T K @ 2014-04-03 13:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Thursday 03 April 2014 07:02 PM, Paolo Pisati wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 10:15:13AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>> Paul uses MMC filesystem, I use NFS. As Felipe Pointed out as well, I
>>> did rootcause MMC filesystem mount issue here:
>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=139637044425644&w=2
>>
>> Balaji, care to take a look at the issue for MMC? It may
>> be already fixed in next with the PBIAS handling?
>
> it may be related (or not), but i'm experiencing reboot issues with 3.13/.14 on
> omap4 (panda), and after a bisection i found out that reverting
>
Do you have any logs for it ?
> commit e002264f7e45d7661b237045577052fd0b40f89c
> Author: Balaji T K <balajitk <at> ti.com>
> Date: Mon Oct 21 00:25:18 2013 +0530
>
> mmc: omap_hsmmc: Fix pbias_disable for omap4
>
> pbias_disable is set to protect the mmc pbias i/o cells in DT boot
> by preventing voltage switch. Currently pbias_disable is enabled only
> for omap3 and not for omap4 due to reg_offset difference of 0x100.
> Enable pbias_disable for omap4+ too by using res->start
> which does not include the reg_offset.
>
> Signed-off-by: Balaji T K <balajitk <at> ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb <at> laptop.org>
>
> made it go away: can you point me to those pbias handling patches (i guess
> something about dt-booting handling pbias correctly now)?
It is avaliable in linux-next /mmc-next [1]
[1]
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/cjb/mmc.git/log/?id=refs/heads/mmc-next
mmc: omap_hsmmc: remove pbias workaround
ARM: OMAP: enable SYSCON and REGULATOR_PBIAS in omap2plus_defconfig
ARM: dts: add pbias dt node
mmc: omap_hsmmc: adapt hsmmc to use pbias regulator
regulator: add pbias regulator support
mmc: omap_hsmmc: handle vcc and vcc_aux independently
mmc: omap_hsmmc: use devm_regulator API
Thanks and Regards,
Balaji T K
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-04-03 13:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-04-02 16:03 OMAP baseline test results for v3.14 Paul Walmsley
2014-04-02 16:21 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-04-02 16:21 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-04-02 16:33 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-04-02 16:32 ` Paul Walmsley
2014-04-02 16:35 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-04-02 16:59 ` menon.nishanth at gmail.com
2014-04-02 17:15 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-04-03 13:32 ` Paolo Pisati
2014-04-03 13:44 ` Balaji T K
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).