From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jszhang@marvell.com (Jisheng Zhang) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 17:14:15 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: dts: document the berlin enable-method property In-Reply-To: <533D21AF.2070508@free-electrons.com> References: <1396512496-8030-1-git-send-email-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> <1396512496-8030-3-git-send-email-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> <20140403162202.79b63729@xhacker> <533D21AF.2070508@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <20140403171415.13adae45@xhacker> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Antoine, On Thu, 3 Apr 2014 01:54:07 -0700 Antoine T?nart wrote: > Jisheng, > > On 03/04/2014 10:22, Jisheng Zhang wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, 3 Apr 2014 01:08:15 -0700 > > Antoine T?nart wrote: > > > >> Signed-off-by: Antoine T?nart > >> --- > >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt | 2 ++ > >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt > >> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt index > >> 333f4aea3029..a9e42a2dbc99 100644 --- > >> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt +++ > >> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt @@ -185,6 +185,8 @@ > >> nodes to be present and contain the properties described below. > >> "qcom,gcc-msm8660" "qcom,kpss-acc-v1" > >> "qcom,kpss-acc-v2" > >> + "marvell,88de31-smp" - cpu-core handling for > > > > why not "marvell,berlin-smp"? > > We have SMP on the BG2 and the BG2Q currently. Future boards may not be > compatible with this method (BG3 ?), I think "marvell,berlin-smp" is too Yes. It's not compatible. But it will be PSCI. FWICT, current smp method would be only used for BG2/BG2CT. Thanks