From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bhelgaas@google.com (Bjorn Helgaas) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 17:39:48 -0600 Subject: [PATCH v7 5/6] pci: Export find_pci_host_bridge() function. In-Reply-To: <1394811272-1547-6-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> References: <1394811272-1547-1-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> <1394811272-1547-6-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Message-ID: <20140404233948.GC15806@google.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 03:34:31PM +0000, Liviu Dudau wrote: > This is a useful function and we should make it visible outside the > generic PCI code. Export it as a GPL symbol. > > Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau > Tested-by: Tanmay Inamdar > --- > drivers/pci/host-bridge.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host-bridge.c b/drivers/pci/host-bridge.c > index 06ace62..8708b652 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/host-bridge.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/host-bridge.c > @@ -17,12 +17,13 @@ static struct pci_bus *find_pci_root_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) > return bus; > } > > -static struct pci_host_bridge *find_pci_host_bridge(struct pci_bus *bus) > +struct pci_host_bridge *find_pci_host_bridge(struct pci_bus *bus) > { > struct pci_bus *root_bus = find_pci_root_bus(bus); > > return to_pci_host_bridge(root_bus->bridge); > } > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(find_pci_host_bridge); Do you have a place where you actually need to use find_pci_host_bridge()? I'd rather not export it, even as _GPL, unless we have a user. If we *do* export it, I'd like it to have a more conventional name, e.g., something starting with "pci_". > > void pci_set_host_bridge_release(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge, > void (*release_fn)(struct pci_host_bridge *), > -- > 1.9.0 >