From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2014 19:52:49 +0100
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/7] drm/exynos: add super device support
In-Reply-To: <53404BF3.2010409@gmail.com>
References: <1396355882-17010-1-git-send-email-inki.dae@samsung.com>
 <1396355882-17010-2-git-send-email-inki.dae@samsung.com>
 <533EB9C6.80302@samsung.com>
 <CAAQKjZPbzb+qvJA5y+Kco9BRv4j3iVatM_0bd+ugyuVZUbfFFg@mail.gmail.com>
 <53403E42.1010403@gmail.com> <20140405182423.GL7528@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <53404BF3.2010409@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20140405185249.GM7528@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 08:31:15PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Maybe my words have been misinterpreted, but all I'm suggesting here is  
> that there is no need to add any new data to DT to solve the same issue  
> to the same extent as componentized subsystem framework, at least in  
> Exynos case.

Right, so we seem to have agreement that what exynos is currently doing
is fundamentally broken.

So the next question is, how is it going to get fixed?

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: now at 9.7Mbps down 460kbps up... slowly
improving, and getting towards what was expected from it.