From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bp@alien8.de (Borislav Petkov) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 17:39:25 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v6 3/5] devicetree: bindings: Document Krait cache error interrupts In-Reply-To: <1396641450-12854-4-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> References: <1396641450-12854-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <1396641450-12854-4-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <20140408153925.GJ30077@pd.tnic> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 12:57:28PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > The Krait L1/L2 error reporting hardware is made up a per-CPU > interrupt for the L1 cache and a SPI interrupt for the L2. > > Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi > Cc: Mark Rutland > Cc: Kumar Gala > Cc: > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cache.txt | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cache.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cache.txt > index b90fcc7c53cf..d7357e777399 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cache.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cache.txt Right, that's http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg308540.html So whoever picks those patches up, Lorenzo's doc needs to be in his tree first too. How about I review the EDAC part and an arm maintainer picks the whole series up? Would that be easier, logistically? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. --