From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: bp@alien8.de (Borislav Petkov)
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 18:42:29 +0200
Subject: [PATCH v6 2/5] ARM: Add Krait L2 register accessor functions
In-Reply-To: <20140408171929.68f328a9@alan.etchedpixels.co.uk>
References: <1396641450-12854-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org>
 <1396641450-12854-3-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org>
 <20140407201838.GC20822@pd.tnic>
 <20140407215649.GH9985@codeaurora.org>
 <20140408064328.GB30077@pd.tnic> <534406BD.8000702@codeaurora.org>
 <20140408151056.GH30077@pd.tnic>
 <20140408171929.68f328a9@alan.etchedpixels.co.uk>
Message-ID: <20140408164228.GM30077@pd.tnic>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 05:19:29PM +0100, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
> Including the without warranty is standard practice at a lot of
> companies. It's not even wasting space - it'll compress beautifully as
> there are already lots of similar headers all over the tree.

Right, I was just trying to find out from Stephen/Christopher whether
they're actually really required by legal to slap the boilerplate or
they can get by with a smaller chunk. That's all.

But thanks for this Alan, I was hoping someone would school me on the
legal practice wrt license boilerplates in the kernel, and there you
are. :-)

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--