* [PATCH] gpio: mxs: Allow for recursive enable_irq_wake() call
@ 2014-03-24 2:38 Marek Vasut
2014-03-24 4:34 ` Shawn Guo
2014-03-27 9:15 ` Linus Walleij
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Marek Vasut @ 2014-03-24 2:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
The scenario here is that someone calls enable_irq_wake() from somewhere
in the code. This will result in the lockdep producing a backtrace as can
be seen below. In my case, this problem is triggered when using the wl1271
(TI WlCore) driver found in drivers/net/wireless/ti/ .
The problem cause is rather obvious from the backtrace, but let's outline
the dependency. enable_irq_wake() grabs the IRQ buslock in irq_set_irq_wake(),
which in turns calls mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq() . But mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq()
calls enable_irq_wake() again on the one-level-higher IRQ , thus it tries to
grab the IRQ buslock again in irq_set_irq_wake() . Because the spinlock in
irq_set_irq_wake()->irq_get_desc_buslock()->__irq_get_desc_lock() is not
marked as recursive, lockdep will spew the stuff below.
We know we can safely re-enter the lock, so use IRQ_GC_INIT_NESTED_LOCK to
fix the spew.
=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
3.10.33-00012-gf06b763-dirty #61 Not tainted
---------------------------------------------
kworker/0:1/18 is trying to acquire lock:
(&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-...}, at: [<c00685f0>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88
but task is already holding lock:
(&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-...}, at: [<c00685f0>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);
lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
3 locks held by kworker/0:1/18:
#0: (events){.+.+.+}, at: [<c0036308>] process_one_work+0x134/0x4a4
#1: ((&fw_work->work)){+.+.+.}, at: [<c0036308>] process_one_work+0x134/0x4a4
#2: (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-...}, at: [<c00685f0>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 18 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 3.10.33-00012-gf06b763-dirty #61
Workqueue: events request_firmware_work_func
[<c0013eb4>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf0) from [<c0011c74>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[<c0011c74>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) from [<c005bb08>] (__lock_acquire+0x140c/0x1a64)
[<c005bb08>] (__lock_acquire+0x140c/0x1a64) from [<c005c6a8>] (lock_acquire+0x9c/0x104)
[<c005c6a8>] (lock_acquire+0x9c/0x104) from [<c051d5a4>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x58)
[<c051d5a4>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x58) from [<c00685f0>] (__irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88)
[<c00685f0>] (__irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88) from [<c0068e78>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x20/0xf4)
[<c0068e78>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x20/0xf4) from [<c027260c>] (mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq+0x1c/0x24)
[<c027260c>] (mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq+0x1c/0x24) from [<c0068cf4>] (set_irq_wake_real+0x30/0x44)
[<c0068cf4>] (set_irq_wake_real+0x30/0x44) from [<c0068ee4>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x8c/0xf4)
[<c0068ee4>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x8c/0xf4) from [<c0310748>] (wlcore_nvs_cb+0x10c/0x97c)
[<c0310748>] (wlcore_nvs_cb+0x10c/0x97c) from [<c02be5e8>] (request_firmware_work_func+0x38/0x58)
[<c02be5e8>] (request_firmware_work_func+0x38/0x58) from [<c0036394>] (process_one_work+0x1c0/0x4a4)
[<c0036394>] (process_one_work+0x1c0/0x4a4) from [<c0036a4c>] (worker_thread+0x138/0x394)
[<c0036a4c>] (worker_thread+0x138/0x394) from [<c003cb74>] (kthread+0xa4/0xb0)
[<c003cb74>] (kthread+0xa4/0xb0) from [<c000ee00>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x34)
wlcore: loaded
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-mxs.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
NOTE 1: I think this should go into -stable as well eventually.
NOTE 2: I developed this on 3.10.33, but I still see this is not fixed in -next.
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxs.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxs.c
index f8e6af2..d599fc4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxs.c
@@ -214,7 +214,8 @@ static void __init mxs_gpio_init_gc(struct mxs_gpio_port *port, int irq_base)
ct->regs.ack = PINCTRL_IRQSTAT(port) + MXS_CLR;
ct->regs.mask = PINCTRL_IRQEN(port);
- irq_setup_generic_chip(gc, IRQ_MSK(32), 0, IRQ_NOREQUEST, 0);
+ irq_setup_generic_chip(gc, IRQ_MSK(32), IRQ_GC_INIT_NESTED_LOCK,
+ IRQ_NOREQUEST, 0);
}
static int mxs_gpio_to_irq(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offset)
--
1.9.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] gpio: mxs: Allow for recursive enable_irq_wake() call
2014-03-24 2:38 [PATCH] gpio: mxs: Allow for recursive enable_irq_wake() call Marek Vasut
@ 2014-03-24 4:34 ` Shawn Guo
2014-03-27 9:15 ` Linus Walleij
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Shawn Guo @ 2014-03-24 4:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 03:38:10AM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> The scenario here is that someone calls enable_irq_wake() from somewhere
> in the code. This will result in the lockdep producing a backtrace as can
> be seen below. In my case, this problem is triggered when using the wl1271
> (TI WlCore) driver found in drivers/net/wireless/ti/ .
>
> The problem cause is rather obvious from the backtrace, but let's outline
> the dependency. enable_irq_wake() grabs the IRQ buslock in irq_set_irq_wake(),
> which in turns calls mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq() . But mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq()
> calls enable_irq_wake() again on the one-level-higher IRQ , thus it tries to
> grab the IRQ buslock again in irq_set_irq_wake() . Because the spinlock in
> irq_set_irq_wake()->irq_get_desc_buslock()->__irq_get_desc_lock() is not
> marked as recursive, lockdep will spew the stuff below.
>
> We know we can safely re-enter the lock, so use IRQ_GC_INIT_NESTED_LOCK to
> fix the spew.
...
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] gpio: mxs: Allow for recursive enable_irq_wake() call
2014-03-24 2:38 [PATCH] gpio: mxs: Allow for recursive enable_irq_wake() call Marek Vasut
2014-03-24 4:34 ` Shawn Guo
@ 2014-03-27 9:15 ` Linus Walleij
2014-04-09 14:26 ` Shawn Guo
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2014-03-27 9:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 3:38 AM, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
> The scenario here is that someone calls enable_irq_wake() from somewhere
> in the code. This will result in the lockdep producing a backtrace as can
> be seen below. In my case, this problem is triggered when using the wl1271
> (TI WlCore) driver found in drivers/net/wireless/ti/ .
>
> The problem cause is rather obvious from the backtrace, but let's outline
> the dependency. enable_irq_wake() grabs the IRQ buslock in irq_set_irq_wake(),
> which in turns calls mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq() . But mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq()
> calls enable_irq_wake() again on the one-level-higher IRQ , thus it tries to
> grab the IRQ buslock again in irq_set_irq_wake() . Because the spinlock in
> irq_set_irq_wake()->irq_get_desc_buslock()->__irq_get_desc_lock() is not
> marked as recursive, lockdep will spew the stuff below.
>
> We know we can safely re-enter the lock, so use IRQ_GC_INIT_NESTED_LOCK to
> fix the spew.
>
> =============================================
> [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
> 3.10.33-00012-gf06b763-dirty #61 Not tainted
> ---------------------------------------------
> kworker/0:1/18 is trying to acquire lock:
> (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-...}, at: [<c00685f0>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-...}, at: [<c00685f0>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
> Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>
> CPU0
> ----
> lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);
> lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);
>
> *** DEADLOCK ***
>
> May be due to missing lock nesting notation
>
> 3 locks held by kworker/0:1/18:
> #0: (events){.+.+.+}, at: [<c0036308>] process_one_work+0x134/0x4a4
> #1: ((&fw_work->work)){+.+.+.}, at: [<c0036308>] process_one_work+0x134/0x4a4
> #2: (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-...}, at: [<c00685f0>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88
>
> stack backtrace:
> CPU: 0 PID: 18 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 3.10.33-00012-gf06b763-dirty #61
> Workqueue: events request_firmware_work_func
> [<c0013eb4>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf0) from [<c0011c74>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
> [<c0011c74>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) from [<c005bb08>] (__lock_acquire+0x140c/0x1a64)
> [<c005bb08>] (__lock_acquire+0x140c/0x1a64) from [<c005c6a8>] (lock_acquire+0x9c/0x104)
> [<c005c6a8>] (lock_acquire+0x9c/0x104) from [<c051d5a4>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x58)
> [<c051d5a4>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x58) from [<c00685f0>] (__irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88)
> [<c00685f0>] (__irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88) from [<c0068e78>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x20/0xf4)
> [<c0068e78>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x20/0xf4) from [<c027260c>] (mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq+0x1c/0x24)
> [<c027260c>] (mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq+0x1c/0x24) from [<c0068cf4>] (set_irq_wake_real+0x30/0x44)
> [<c0068cf4>] (set_irq_wake_real+0x30/0x44) from [<c0068ee4>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x8c/0xf4)
> [<c0068ee4>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x8c/0xf4) from [<c0310748>] (wlcore_nvs_cb+0x10c/0x97c)
> [<c0310748>] (wlcore_nvs_cb+0x10c/0x97c) from [<c02be5e8>] (request_firmware_work_func+0x38/0x58)
> [<c02be5e8>] (request_firmware_work_func+0x38/0x58) from [<c0036394>] (process_one_work+0x1c0/0x4a4)
> [<c0036394>] (process_one_work+0x1c0/0x4a4) from [<c0036a4c>] (worker_thread+0x138/0x394)
> [<c0036a4c>] (worker_thread+0x138/0x394) from [<c003cb74>] (kthread+0xa4/0xb0)
> [<c003cb74>] (kthread+0xa4/0xb0) from [<c000ee00>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x34)
> wlcore: loaded
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Thanks Marek, patch applied and I also added Cc: stable.
I would like someone to look into converting the MXS to use the new
gpiolib irqchip helpers merged on my devel branch so we can centralize
and get rid of surplus redundant bug fixing everywhere around the drivers.
That code does not use generic irqchip, but rather a regular irqchip+domain
and explicitly chained interrupt handlers.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] gpio: mxs: Allow for recursive enable_irq_wake() call
2014-03-27 9:15 ` Linus Walleij
@ 2014-04-09 14:26 ` Shawn Guo
2014-04-10 18:20 ` Linus Walleij
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Shawn Guo @ 2014-04-09 14:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:15:27AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> I would like someone to look into converting the MXS to use the new
> gpiolib irqchip helpers merged on my devel branch so we can centralize
> and get rid of surplus redundant bug fixing everywhere around the drivers.
>
> That code does not use generic irqchip, but rather a regular irqchip+domain
> and explicitly chained interrupt handlers.
No. The driver uses generic irqchip. See function mxs_gpio_init_gc().
Shawn
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] gpio: mxs: Allow for recursive enable_irq_wake() call
2014-04-09 14:26 ` Shawn Guo
@ 2014-04-10 18:20 ` Linus Walleij
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2014-04-10 18:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@freescale.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:15:27AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> I would like someone to look into converting the MXS to use the new
>> gpiolib irqchip helpers merged on my devel branch so we can centralize
>> and get rid of surplus redundant bug fixing everywhere around the drivers.
>>
>> That code does not use generic irqchip, but rather a regular irqchip+domain
>> and explicitly chained interrupt handlers.
>
> No. The driver uses generic irqchip. See function mxs_gpio_init_gc().
Hm I see.
Still I think it should be possible to lift some code into gpiolib also
with generic chips. Must be some elegant refactoring lurking
here...
Yours,
Linus Walleij
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-04-10 18:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-03-24 2:38 [PATCH] gpio: mxs: Allow for recursive enable_irq_wake() call Marek Vasut
2014-03-24 4:34 ` Shawn Guo
2014-03-27 9:15 ` Linus Walleij
2014-04-09 14:26 ` Shawn Guo
2014-04-10 18:20 ` Linus Walleij
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).