From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: reinsert ARCH_MULTI_V4 Kconfig option
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 17:13:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140409151326.GY29751@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140409150640.GQ16119@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Hello Russell,
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 04:06:40PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 04:54:16PM +0200, Jonas Jensen wrote:
> > On 13 December 2013 12:39, Russell King - ARM Linux
> > <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > > I see what's causing this: the kuser helpers are using "bx lr" to return
> > > which will be undefined on non-Thumb CPUs. We generally cope fine with
> > > non-Thumb CPUs, conditionalising where necessary on HWCAP_THUMB or the
> > > T bit in the PSR being set.
> > >
> > > However, it looks like the kuser helpers got missed. As a check, please
> > > look at arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S, find the line with:
> > >
> > > .macro usr_ret, reg
> > >
> > > and ensure that the mov pc, \reg case always gets used. Please report
> > > back.
> >
> > Uwe and Arnd came up with a solution except it doesn't work when I test it.
> >
> > The suggested patch is:
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
> > index 1879e8d..de15bfd 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
> > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
> > @@ -739,6 +739,18 @@ ENDPROC(__switch_to)
> >
> > .macro usr_ret, reg
> > #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_THUMB
> > + /*
> > + * Having CONFIG_ARM_THUMB isn't a guarantee that the cpu has support
> > + * for Thumb and so the bx instruction. Use a mov if the address to
> > + * jump to is 32 bit aligned. (Note that this code is compiled in ARM
> > + * mode, so this is the right test.)
> > + */
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_CPU_32v4)
> > + tst \reg, #3
> > + moveq pc, \reg
> > + b .
> > +#endif
> > +
> > bx \reg
>
> What's wrong with:
> tst \reg, #3
> moveq pc, \reg
> bx \reg
>
> rather than ending in an infinite loop?
The added b . was a test to check if the machine then hangs instead of
crashing. (And yes, that was the case, so it was tried to return to a
non-aligned address.)
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-09 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-13 8:09 [PATCH] ARM: reinsert ARCH_MULTI_V4 Kconfig option Jonas Jensen
2013-12-13 9:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-12-13 10:51 ` Jonas Jensen
2013-12-13 11:39 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-12-13 13:33 ` Jonas Jensen
2014-04-09 14:54 ` Jonas Jensen
2014-04-09 15:04 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-04-09 15:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-04-09 15:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-04-09 15:13 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2014-04-09 15:27 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-04-09 15:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-09 16:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-04-10 8:04 ` Jonas Jensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140409151326.GY29751@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).