From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: vinod.koul@intel.com (Vinod Koul)
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 21:31:09 +0530
Subject: [PATCH RESEND] dma: mmp_pdma: add support for residue reporting
In-Reply-To: <534E9AC1.1040706@zonque.org>
References: <1392636546-15541-1-git-send-email-zonque@gmail.com>
 <20140319151352.GJ1976@intel.com> <534576C3.2020409@zonque.org>
 <20140416064534.GL32284@intel.com> <534E3F3D.5080003@zonque.org>
 <20140416082326.GM32284@intel.com> <534E4172.8030401@zonque.org>
 <20140416090923.GR32284@intel.com> <534E9AC1.1040706@zonque.org>
Message-ID: <20140416160109.GU32284@intel.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 04:59:13PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On 04/16/2014 11:09 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 10:38:10AM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> >>>> It might add to the readability of the drivers, but for the current
> >>>> case, I don't think it's really necessary.
> >>> That is because you are maintaining the current descriptors in chain_running. If
> >>> we use above method then you dont need to use this, right?
> >>
> >> Jup, but that would result in a rewrite of larger parts of the code. The
> >> concept of hot-linking the two list so there's only one resulting list
> >> of currently active descriptors is built-in deeply into the driver's
> >> concept.
> > Ah I suspected so :)
> > 
> > I think for now this is fine you can perhaps upgrade this later :)
> 
> So, do you want me to resend with the minor dma_set_residue() change?
Yes please...

-- 
~Vinod