From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones)
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 12:29:13 +0100
Subject: [PATCH v4 5/8] mfd: db8500-prcmu: Use cpufreq_for_each_entry
 macro for iteration
In-Reply-To: <535635d0.8908b40a.6c36.ffffaaa9SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com>
References: <535635d0.8908b40a.6c36.ffffaaa9SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com>
Message-ID: <20140422112913.GB21613@lee--X1>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

> > > The cpufreq core now supports the cpufreq_for_each_entry macro helper 
> > > for iteration over the cpufreq_frequency_table, so use it. 
> > > 
> > > It should have no functional changes. 
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr> 
> > > --- 
> >
> > It would be good to have a changelog which describes the differences 
> > between the versions, so we can keep track. 
> >
> > >? drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c | 19 ++++++++----------- 
> > >? 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) 
> >
> > So it looks like I already applied v2 of this patch to my tree. What 
> > changed in v3 and v4? Should I remove that patch from MFD and apply 
> > this one instead?
> 
> I'm sorry for the confusion.
> I sent v3 only for patches 1/8 and 3/8.
> So, I was asked by Rafael to resend the entire series as v4
> in order to be clear which is the latest version in each patch.
> Unfortunately, I omit the change log :(
> 
> The specific patch (5/8) is unchanged since v2.
> 
> I'm sorry for the inconvenience.

That's okay, thanks for clarifying.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog