linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Liviu.Dudau@arm.com (Liviu Dudau)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/2] PCI: designware: Add ARM64 PCI support
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 14:01:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140422130122.GH865@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000501cf5d48$4cf707c0$e6e51740$%han@samsung.com>

On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 10:58:52AM +0100, Jingoo Han wrote:
> On Monday, April 21, 2014 10:54 AM, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > On Thursday, April 17, 2014 3:26 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 16 April 2014 17:57:24 Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > > > Jingoo,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for taking a stab at trying to convert a host bridge
> > > > driver to use the new generic host bridge code.
> > > >
> > > > I do however have concerns on the direction you took. You have split
> > > > your driver in two, depending on whether it was CONFIG_ARM or CONFIG_ARM64,
> > > > even if (with my series) it should be no reason why the host bridge
> > > > driver should not work on other architectures as well once they are
> > > > converted.
> > >
> > > Right.
> > >
> > > > Also, some of the functions that you use have identical names but different
> > > > signatures depending on what arch you have selected. This is really bad
> > > > in my books!
> 
> [.....]
> 
> > > > What about creating functions that use my series directly if CONFIG_ARM64 is
> > > > defined (or any CONFIG_ you want to create for your driver that you select
> > > > from CONFIG_ARM64) and otherwise implement the CONFIG_ARM version? That
> > > > way your driver will call only one API without any #ifdef and when arm code
> > > > gets converted you drop your adaptation functions. Or (better yet), have a
> > > > stab at converting bios32 (Rob Herring has already provided some hints on
> > > > how to do it for arch/arm).
> > 
> > To: Liviu Dudau
> > 
> > Sorry, but I will not implement this.
> > At first, you had to think the compatibility with ARM32 PCIe.
> > Why do you want other engineers to take this load?
> 
> (+cc Rob Herring)
> 
> Um, I am looking at Rob Herring's patchset for Versatile PCI. [1]
> Then, do you mean the following?
> 
> 1. Add Rob Herring's patch converting bios32. [2]
> 2. Reference Rob Herring's patch in order to know how to
>     handle "of_create_pci_host_bridge()" directly in ARM32. [3]
> 3. Use of_create_pci_host_bridge() for the designware PCIe
>     driver in ARM32.
> 4. Also, use of_create_pci_host_bridge() for the designware PCIe
>     driver in "ARM64".
> 

Sounds like a good plan. 3 and 4 should be one and the same in my opinion, but
there might be more things in designware driver that I am missing right now.

Best regards,
Liviu

> 
> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pci/msg30084.html
> [2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pci/msg30083.html
> [3] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pci/msg30086.html
> 
> Best regards,
> Jingoo Han
> 
> > 
> > >
> > > That would of course be best.
> > >
> 
> [.....]
> 
> 

-- 
====================
| I would like to |
| fix the world,  |
| but they're not |
| giving me the   |
 \ source code!  /
  ---------------
    ?\_(?)_/?

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-22 13:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-16  4:41 [RFC PATCH 0/2] Add support for Samsung GH7 PCIe controller Jingoo Han
2014-04-16  4:42 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] PCI: designware: Add ARM64 PCI support Jingoo Han
2014-04-16 16:57   ` Liviu Dudau
2014-04-16 18:26     ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-21  1:54       ` Jingoo Han
2014-04-21  9:58         ` Jingoo Han
2014-04-22 13:01           ` Liviu Dudau [this message]
2014-04-22 15:39           ` Rob Herring
2014-04-22 12:59         ` Liviu Dudau
2014-04-22 12:54       ` Liviu Dudau
2014-04-16  4:43 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] PCI: exynos: Add PCIe support for Samsung GH7 SoC Jingoo Han
2014-04-22 14:11   ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-23  9:19     ` Kukjin Kim
2014-04-23 11:03       ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-23 14:23         ` Liviu Dudau
2014-04-23 16:20           ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-24  4:53             ` Kukjin Kim
2014-04-24  9:49               ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-23 13:00       ` Liviu Dudau
2014-04-24 12:25         ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140422130122.GH865@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).