From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 14:59:04 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 5/5] ARM: sunxi: Remove sun4i and sun7i machine definitions In-Reply-To: <1401022774.yKcHJAmPtb@wuerfel> References: <1398265476-29373-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <1398265476-29373-6-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <1401022774.yKcHJAmPtb@wuerfel> Message-ID: <20140424125904.GY24905@lukather> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 06:02:51PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 23 April 2014 17:04:36 Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > > -static void __init sunxi_dt_init(void) > > -{ > > - of_platform_populate(NULL, of_default_bus_match_table, NULL, NULL); > > -} > > - > > -static const char * const sunxi_board_dt_compat[] = { > > - "allwinner,sun4i-a10", > > - "allwinner,sun5i-a10s", > > - "allwinner,sun5i-a13", > > - NULL, > > -}; > > - > > -DT_MACHINE_START(SUNXI_DT, "Allwinner A1X (Device Tree)") > > - .init_machine = sunxi_dt_init, > > - .dt_compat = sunxi_board_dt_compat, > > -MACHINE_END > > - > > static const char * const sun6i_board_dt_compat[] = { > > "allwinner,sun6i-a31", > > NULL, > > I'd like to hear more opinions on this. We could either rely > on the generic code, or we could keep the entry with just > the .dt_compat line and the name, so /proc/cpuinfo contains > a meaningful platform name. Ah! I haven't thought of /proc/cpuinfo. I agree that having something meaningful in there would be much better. I'll respin the patch if Olof agrees. Thanks! Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: