From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: christoffer.dall@linaro.org (Christoffer Dall) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 06:06:39 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v8 3/3] ARM: Check if a CPU has gone offline In-Reply-To: <535E519B.7070101@redhat.com> References: <1398455329-18136-1-git-send-email-ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> <1398455329-18136-4-git-send-email-ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> <535E519B.7070101@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20140428130639.GD2868@lvm> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 03:03:23PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 28/04/2014 14:23, Christoffer Dall ha scritto: > >Are they inter-dependent? I thought your patches depended on Anup's - > >not the other way around? > > > >If my assumption is correct, I think we can make sure to send the pull > >request to kvm/next early and ask Catalin to pull in kvm/next before > >pulling your changes. > > > >I'm cc'ing both Catalin and Paolo here for their advice. > > Is Anup's patchset already on a branch? If you send me a pointer to > it I can look at that branch history and see what's best. > I didn't merge it yet - need to make one final pass over it (likely later tonight). But this is the series: https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/pipermail/kvmarm/2014-April/009061.html I believe Ashwin's patch set depends only on "ARM/ARM64: KVM: Add common header for PSCI related defines". Thanks, -Christoffer