From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com (Antoine =?iso-8859-1?Q?T=E9nart?=) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 19:05:24 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v2 6/7] Documentation: add the Marvell Berlin pinctrl documentation In-Reply-To: <535B7FFC.3000109@gmail.com> References: <1398268276-9696-1-git-send-email-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> <1398268276-9696-7-git-send-email-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> <535B7FFC.3000109@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20140428170524.GB4211@kwain> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Sebastian, On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 11:44:28AM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > On 04/23/2014 05:51 PM, Antoine T?nart wrote: [?] > > +A pin-controller node should contain subnodes representing the pin group > > +configurations, one per group. Each subnode has the group name and the muxing > > ",one per group" isn't correct, is it? You can have one subnode with > more than one group, like in your example below. Sure, I forgot to update this one after adding the ability to configure multiple groups in the same subnode. Antoine -- Antoine T?nart, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com