[PATCH net-next 5/7] net:fec: add support for dumping transmit ring on timeout

[linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)]

On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 09:54:09AM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 09:22:13AM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> >> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 02:01:54PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> >> >> From: Frank ...
> >> >> > > You probably want the read and write indexes as well.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >                      bdp == fep->cur_tx ? 'S' : ' ',
> >> >> >                      bdp == fep->dirty_tx ? 'H' : ' ',
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Above code already print read and write index. 'S', 'H'
> >> >>
> >> >> Gah I must be asleep!
> >> >> Something made be think that was to do with the ring ownership bit!
> >> >
> >> > Err, what's going on... this is my patch.  If it's been submitted by
> >> > others, why wasn't its submission at least Cc'd to me?
> >>
> >> I added " --to rmk+kernel at arm.linux.org.uk" when I send patch.
> >> I don't know what's wrong.
> >
> > Yes... I guess you don't know what went wrong because you'll never know
> > if it failed to be delivered, because you sent them with an envelope
> > address of "b20596 at shlinux1.ap.freescale.net" which doesn't actually
> > exist.  Therefore, DSNs can't be returned to you.
> >
> >> I ask you if need someone help send to david millar before.
> >
> > You did, but I didn't agree to it.  I did point out that they need a
> > certain amount of rework first:
> 
> Sorry, I miss understood your means.
> I will stop working on this.

I'd just like to see what you're doing.  Note that your submission also
didn't get through the linux-arm-kernel list either, so I didn't get it
via that path either.

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: now at 9.7Mbps down 460kbps up... slowly
improving, and getting towards what was expected from it.