From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@kernel.org (Mark Brown) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 09:56:30 -0700 Subject: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: fsl: select SND_SOC_IMX_PCM_DMA where needed In-Reply-To: <535FB793.5050200@metafoo.de> References: <6606961.lAGLvkNsEj@wuerfel> <4270904.84oGcCXL4B@wuerfel> <535F8594.40609@metafoo.de> <4275868.O962kiiyJa@wuerfel> <535FB793.5050200@metafoo.de> Message-ID: <20140429165630.GD16981@sirena.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 04:30:43PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > Yes. The patch should also add a select for SND_SOC_IMX_PCM_FIQ as that is > used in the same way in the fsl_ssi driver. If anybody is afraid that > selecting both SND_SOC_IMX_PCM_FIQ and SND_SOC_IMX_PCM_DMA by default adds > too much overhead you could add boolean sub-options that allow to > enable/disable support individually. Yes, the overhead should be negligable since the FIQ code is tiny. Arnd, please CC maintainers on patches - you've sent this to my Linaro address again and not added Liam. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: