From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: rostedt@goodmis.org (Steven Rostedt) Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 15:02:06 -0400 Subject: [PATCH v8 1/8] ftrace: make CALLER_ADDRx macros more generic In-Reply-To: <20140502181348.GD14645@arm.com> References: <1394862048-28758-1-git-send-email-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> <1398851676-16389-1-git-send-email-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> <1398851676-16389-2-git-send-email-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> <20140502181348.GD14645@arm.com> Message-ID: <20140502150206.4afa9b1a@gandalf.local.home> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, 2 May 2014 19:13:48 +0100 Will Deacon wrote: > Hi Akashi, > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:54:29AM +0100, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > > Most archs with HAVE_ARCH_CALLER_ADDR have the almost same definitions > > of CALLER_ADDRx(n), and so put them into linux/ftrace.h. > > > > Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro > > --- > > arch/arm/include/asm/ftrace.h | 10 +--------- > > arch/blackfin/include/asm/ftrace.h | 11 +---------- > > arch/parisc/include/asm/ftrace.h | 10 +--------- > > arch/sh/include/asm/ftrace.h | 10 +--------- > > arch/xtensa/include/asm/ftrace.h | 14 ++++---------- > > include/linux/ftrace.h | 34 ++++++++++++++++++---------------- > > 6 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-) > > This one looks a bit too widespread to be merged via the arm64 tree. I > wonder if the ftrace maintainers would consider taking it as a cleanup? > I actually was the one to recommend this approach. But I have some small comments to the patch. I'll reply directly to the patch with them. -- Steve