From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: pullip.cho@samsung.com (Cho KyongHo)
Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 09:44:53 +0900
Subject: [PATCH v12 00/31] iommu/exynos: Fixes and Enhancements of System
 MMU driver with DT
In-Reply-To: <5369252F.4070402@gmail.com>
References: <1398584283-22846-1-git-send-email-shaik.ameer@samsung.com>
 <26065037.GxQQuIURPg@wuerfel>
 <CAOD6ATqZ5UwRwSKiPDQLrgmX=UUrJVE7ybM_RhXz_CEUjM3W7w@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140506175904.GB12376@8bytes.org> <5369252F.4070402@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20140507094453.28f0429152e5b59a5dda9fd8@samsung.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Tue, 06 May 2014 20:08:47 +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On 06.05.2014 19:59, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 04:27:10PM +0530, Shaik Ameer Basha wrote:
> >> This series is going on for quite a long time and most of the patches here
> >> doesn't depend on dt bindings. As Exynos IOMMU h/w is introducing new versions
> >> very frequently, maintaining and reviewing all these patches again and
> >> again is quite a hard job.
> >>
> >> If it is acceptable, I can post one more series with the subset of
> >> above patches,
> >> which doesn't depend on dt-bindings. As all the patches which doesn't depend on
> >> DT bindings are already tested,  I hope merging these subset of patches may help
> >> in reducing the rework and review effort every time.
> >>
> >> Once we finalize the generic DT bindings for the IOMMU devices, the driver
> >> can be updated with the proposed DT bindings in mind.
> >
> > Sounds reasonable to me if the patch subset is self-contained. When
> > Arnd is OK with that and no one else has objections I can take the
> > dt-independend parts.
> 
> +1.
> 
> I would also suggest dropping patch 18/31, for the reasons I mentioned 
> in my reply to it.
> 

Great.

We will prepare the next patch series that are independent upon DT bindings soon.

Thank you.

KyongHo