From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones) Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 09:59:41 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v2 3/7] mfd: add support for sun6i PRCM (Power/Reset/Clock Management) unit In-Reply-To: <536C91A6.6000500@free-electrons.com> References: <1399483554-8824-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <1399483554-8824-4-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <20140508110205.GB5767@lee--X1> <536BE366.8080907@free-electrons.com> <20140509071246.GE5767@lee--X1> <536C84F6.2050701@redhat.com> <20140509080807.GH5767@lee--X1> <536C8F71.5040604@redhat.com> <536C91A6.6000500@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <20140509085941.GM5767@lee--X1> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > >>>>>>> +static struct platform_driver sun6i_prcm_driver = { > >>>>>>> + .driver = { > >>>>>>> + .name = "sun6i-prcm", > >>>>>>> + .owner = THIS_MODULE, > >>>>>>> + .of_match_table = sun6i_prcm_dt_ids, > >>>>>>> + }, > >>>>>>> + .probe = sun6i_prcm_probe, > >>>>>> You need a .remove() call-back. > >>>>> This driver cannot be compiled as module (see the Kconfig definition) > >>>>> and the devices are not hotpluggable, as a result a probed device will > >>>>> never be removed. > >>>>> > >>>>> Do you still want me to implement the remove function ? > >>>> .remove() also be run on shut down. > >>> That is not true, if your device needs to do anything special at shutdown > >>> you need to add a shutdown callback. Devices are kept as is (not torn down) > >>> on shutdown. > >> Ah okay, I'll bow to your knowledge. So there's no reason for this > >> driver to ever call mfd_remove_devices() then? > > No, this is an integral part of the SOC, which never gets removed in any way. > > Lee, I'm about to send a 3rd version of this series, is it okay for you > if I leave the remove function unimplemented ? It is. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog