From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas) Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 15:46:20 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Define _TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG In-Reply-To: <20140509140316.GU2844@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1399636665-4127-1-git-send-email-broonie@kernel.org> <20140509140316.GU2844@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> Message-ID: <20140509144619.GH7950@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 03:03:16PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 12:57:45PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > From: Mark Brown > > > > arm64 defines TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG but not the corresponding shifted version, > > breaking the build with next-20140509 due to fd99f91aa007b (sched/idle: > > Avoid spurious wakeup IPIs) which added a reference to the shifted version > > which is present on most arches. > > Sorry about that, > > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra I replied already in another thread. I don't think we need this bit at all. > Should I get it in -tip so borkage and fix come in through the same > tree, or what's the preferred routing? Whatever it's easier for you. -- Catalin